Skip to content

feat(frontend): Support flow control (backpressure) visualization in frontend#4295

Draft
yunyad wants to merge 2 commits intoapache:mainfrom
yunyad:yunyad-backpressure-vis-frontend
Draft

feat(frontend): Support flow control (backpressure) visualization in frontend#4295
yunyad wants to merge 2 commits intoapache:mainfrom
yunyad:yunyad-backpressure-vis-frontend

Conversation

@yunyad
Copy link
Contributor

@yunyad yunyad commented Mar 15, 2026

What changes were proposed in this PR?

Any related issues, documentation, discussions?

How was this PR tested?

Was this PR authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?

@github-actions github-actions bot added the frontend Changes related to the frontend GUI label Mar 15, 2026
@yunyad yunyad marked this pull request as draft March 15, 2026 09:17
@Yicong-Huang
Copy link
Contributor

@yunyad I suggest you to use github issues to track multiple steps of task. Adding [1/3] [3/3] in the PR title is not ideal: the pr could get reverted, redo, or you may need an extra step 4 after you finish first 3. Using issues and sub-issues would be easier to manage these. Thanks.

@chenlica
Copy link
Contributor

@yunyad ?

@yunyad
Copy link
Contributor Author

yunyad commented Mar 18, 2026

@Yicong-Huang Thanks for the suggestion. I can create a tracking issue with sub-issues and link all PRs there, and remove the [1/3] style from the titles. I’ll update soon.

@chenlica could you clarify are you asking for an update, or do you have a concern with the approach? Thank you!

@yunyad yunyad changed the title feat(frontend): [3/3] Support flow control (backpressure) visualization in frontend feat(frontend): Support flow control (backpressure) visualization in frontend Mar 18, 2026
@chenlica
Copy link
Contributor

@yunyad I was asking you to reply to @Yicong-Huang's suggestions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

frontend Changes related to the frontend GUI

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants